Matt Perry
is writing

How to fix: useEffect’s dependency size error

React has a great new Hook that replaces componentDidMount, componentDidUpdate and componentWillUnmount with one simple, functionally-encapsulated API.

It's called useEffect, and it looks like this:

const Component = () => {
useEffect(() => {
return <div />;

Its default behaviour is to run after every render, but we can change this behaviour by passing an array of variables as useEffect's final argument. Whenever one or more of these variables change, useEffect will fire after the next render:

useEffect(() => {
console.log(`The latest count is ${count}`);
}, [count]);

So consider this API from Popmotion's Pose:

<Sidebar pose={['visible', 'active']}>

Here, we've got a pose property that accepts an array of one or more "poses" to control its animations.

Previously, we'd have used a check in componentDidUpdate to manually iterate over the previous and the next arrays to see if they're different to each other:

componentDidUpdate(prevProps) {
const hasChanged = !isArrayEqual(prevProps.pose, this.props.pose)
if (hasChanged) {

But now, with useEffect's final argument, it's a simple matter of passing the pose array to useEffect, and we'll get this comparison for free!

useEffect(() => {
}, pose);

Hell yeah! Except hell no. If the length of pose changes, React will throw you this error:

The final argument passed to useEffect changed size between renders. The order and size of this array must remain constant.

The problem is that we can't always know if an externally-created array is going to change in length.

If can't know it, we shouldn't assume it.

Especially as the insidious truth is, the array may only rarely change in length, which means this error might not throw until its out in the wild.

The fix

If our array is just numbers or strings, this is an easy fix. You can use the Array.join() method:

useEffect(() => {
}, [pose.join(",")]);

So instead of passing an array like this:

["visible", "hidden"];

You're now passing an array like this:


Your array prop will now always take up just one item in the useEffect comparitor array.

What's with the comma?

Oh yeah. So the comma might seem superfluous. After all, it's unlikely that different pose names are going to return the same string when you join them.

But crucially, it isn't impossible. And if the array contains numbers instead of strings, this scenario becomes far more likely:

[0, 1, 2] -> ['012']
[0, 12] -> ['012']

By providing join with a separator (it could be any character), you're ensuring the returned string remains unique for all combinations.

[0, 1, 2] -> ['0,1,2']
[0, 12] -> ['0,12']


Whenever I post a blog like this with a solution I want to show you any "developer moments" aka "what the fuck was I thinking" moments that I enjoyed along the way.

In this case my initial attempt at fixing the bug was to pad the incoming array by an arbitrary amount. I felt like 10 would be more than enough poses for any one component:

useEffect(() => {
}, pad(pose, 10));

So our pose array from before would become:

["visible", "hidden", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null];

And the comparitor array given to React would remain the same length, no matter how pose grew or shrank.

It worked, but despite 10 being quite a generous pose amount, it's hardly bullet-proof. It also creates a new array which is more memory-intensive than a string. It's not a big deal but when we're dealing with animations its better to keep garbage collection down where you can.

Photo of Matt Perry
Matt Perry is a developer and photographer currently living in Amsterdam.

Twitter | Instagram